【丁子江】新實用主義與當代東方儒學的一包養價格趨向

requestId:684c3e3691fb67.20691734.

New practical theory and the trend of contemporary Oriental Confucianism

Author: Ding Zijiang (Doctor of Philosophy, professor in the Department of Philosophy, american California State Polytechnic)

Source: “Confucian Hall” (Chinese and English) Issue 3, 2020

Abstract:This article focuses on analyzing and comparing the current trend of the new practical theory in Oriental Confucianism Research, reminding how it constitutes a certain trend of thought movement in Oriental Confucianism Research. When analyzing this trend, this article will review its focus topic. An important goal of this article is to explore the similarity and differences between these academic topics and discuss some of the fairness of the debate and even confusing discussion topics. The meaning of the new practical theme of Confucianism is multiple: it opens up a new stage for the development of contemporary Oriental Confucianism research, and expands Confucius’ thoughts more broadly and profoundly into other humanistic areas of the Oriental cognition world and even among the popular and popular people.

Keywords:Practical Theory New Practical Theory Analyzing the Practical Theory New Practical Theory of Confucianism The trend of the development of Oriental Confucianism

From 2010 to the present, the Oriental Confucianism Research and Research have experienced evolution and development. This article will review the department’s Oriental Confucian works, and focus on analyzing and comparing the new pragmatism trends exposed in current Confucianism. First, outline it, and then remind them how they form a branch of Confucianism. In analyzing some of the main issues of Confucianism in this trend, this article will provide some arguments and judgments on these arguments. An important goal of this article is to explore the similarities and differences between these academic topics, and to discuss some of the fairness of the disputes and even confusing points.

1. The origin of the new practical theory of Confucianism

The so-called new practical theory can also be called the later practical theory, the language practical theory or the analytical practical theory, which can be called classical practical theory The theory is a replica and variation in the context of a new social context such as economy, politics, civilization, etc. It advocates the analysis of various social phenomena from a new, multi-school cognitive and analysis perspective, and provides innovative and useful recognition and analysis methods, abandoning corruption and ineffective things, and striving to solve actual problems. From the perspective of certain meaning, the new practical approach has a directive effect on the research and development of Oriental Confucianism.

Richard Rorty, a famous contemporary philosopher, can be regarded as the representative of this new practical theoryA scholar, he has had a grand impact on contemporary thinking. Rowey pointed out: “There are two great philosophers in the 20th century, one is Ludwig Wittgenstein and the other is John Dewey. What Wittgenstein’s great lies in the fact that what he wrote gives people what he seems to be unknown to others; what Dewey’s great lies in the fact that what he wrote gives people what he seems to be unknown to others.”[1] Although Dewey’s thought was once distracted, he later analyzed the help of philosophers Rowey and others, and returned to the trend. In the late 1970s of the 20th century, the relative lack of research and discussion for Dewey’s mind was changed due to several changes. One of these is Rotti’s advocacy of releasing analytical philosophy to practical significance. [2] At this point, Dewey is one of the “good Han” he announced. Some scholars evaluate, Dewey conducted a profound and systematic assessment and criticism of traditional binary theory. Judging from the modern value of Dewey’s philosophy, it also deeply affects the new practical thought that emerged in the 1970s of the 20th century. Strong criticism has become the style of Dewey Philosophy. Although Ye was quite visible in the early 20th century, Ye was gradually concealed by other philosophical methods, such as the British and American analyzing schools. Although the phenomenon of Europe has developed to a very positive level, the philosophical trends have led to the interpretation of these rigid paradigms and the revival of Dewey’s approach. W.V.O.Quine’s “naturalizing epistemology” plan is based on the naturalistic assumption expected in Dewey’s theories of exploration. The worship system explored by practical ideologies such as Dewey has attracted the attention of major philosophers such as Rotty and Jürgen Habermas. American morphologists like Sandra Rosenthal and James Edie have examined the closure between phenomenon and practical theory, while analyzing the philosopher Hilary Putnam is more in line with the closure between his own ethics and Dewey’s ethics. The diversified problem discussed in the philosophical community recently means regaining interest in Dewey Philosophy and not expecting to continue to develop for a while in the future. [3]

As an anti-metaphysical essentialist, anti-epistemic foundationalist and unrestrained theories, Rotti’s new practical theory aims to promote the unrestrained and civilian gangs, and target the rigid effects of Eastern philosophy and scientific traditions, and to reduce contemporary thinking, stimulate personal creativity and the breadth of society. Rotti has expanded himself from the concept of essentialism and developedA complete self-view that is not constrained by originality. Therefore, in order to avoid unpreventable world behavior, he must promote the “endurable group”.

Roty’s masterpiece “Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature” has an influence in the philosophical world. In his book, he criticized a series of philosophers such as René Descartes and Hegel (Ge Summary 1: org W.F. Hegel). In the article “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity”, Rotti criticized Habermas while supporting Jean-François Lyotard. Rotti pointed out that anything that Habemas regarded as “theoretical exploration” was regarded as “Yuanxiong” by Rottad, who advocated doubt. And any discrepancy in this theory is considered by Habermas as a sensible sensibility because it dispels the idea of ​​reforms that have been used since the start of Mongolian movement (which draws the history of the Oriental dominance) for legitimacy; this idea still serves as a criticism of the social economic habits of the unrestrained world and the communist world. For Habermas, abandoning a venue that is not a precursor but at best a social hope that is known as the focus of unrestricted political science. To Rotti, philosophy cannot define eternal cognitive structures in groping. The unique influence of philosophers is to dismiss the perception of a view to prevent “there are points”. The political view of major philosophers does not need to be more serious than their own philosophical view. Any relationship between concepts and reality, moral status and philosophical writing are purely temporary and occasional. Therefore, a new approach to research is no longer an evaluation of literature production, nor a prophecy of history, moral philosophy, cognition and society, but a new combination of origin. Rotty called Friedrich Nietzsche, William James, Martin Heidegger, Wittgenstein and Dewey the “metaphysical destructionists” because they destroyed the philosophical cornerstones of laying the foundation for knowledge. The reason why Michel Foucault and practical ideologues all argue: (1) There is no standard that they are not created during the process of creating reality; (2) There is no sensory standard that they do not complain about the above standards; (3) There is no self that they do not serve the people themselves.A strict and strict statement. Rotty himself inherited the garment of the realism and refused to treat truth as something that was discussed with philosophical interest, but regarded it as the name of all the real statements.

Roty called Dewey, Heidegger and Wittgenstein the most important philosophers in the 20th century. When discussing Dewey’s philosophy, he once pointed out that “Dewey’s practical idea is the best direction to understand the modern world.” Rotty had a famous early argument, that is, when British and American analytical philosophers and French philosophers, such as Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, they would find that Dewey was waiting for them. Rotti said that Dewey and Jacques Derrida shared hope and viewing on changing humans. [4] In Patrick J. Deneen, Rothy, Vaclav Havel and Dewey all have hope and viewing ideas about changing humans. For example, Rothy once promoted people in Achieving Our Country to adopt Dewey’s practical love theory. [5] But considering Rotti’s anti-base theory stand, some scholars criticized: He could not appeal to the emotional consensus of broadness. As long as a Dalvin-style battle is carried out between the structures of competition, the descriptive conviction must be the decisive reason for the “useful” situation. Since there is no final or “final” recitation as an arbitrator, there is a control of the meaning of the recitation that controls the basis of the verbal dialogue, that is, what is considered a “working solidarity”. “Roty’s practical idea is